Posts

The Ancient Art of Negotiation: Lessons from History That Modern Aussie Businesses Are Completely Ignoring

Three weeks ago, I watched a junior sales rep completely botch what should've been a straightforward contract renewal. The client was practically begging to stay, but this kid went in guns blazing with PowerPoint slides and quarterly projections. Made me think about how we've forgotten the most basic lessons our ancestors knew about getting what you want.

Here's the thing that drives me mental: we've got more negotiation "experts" than ever before, yet most Australian businesses negotiate like they're reading from a customer service script. Meanwhile, ancient civilisations were closing deals that lasted centuries using principles we've completely abandoned.

What the Romans Knew That Your Sales Team Doesn't

The Romans didn't have Zoom calls or CRM systems, but they built an empire through negotiations. Their secret? They understood that every negotiation is actually three conversations happening simultaneously.

First conversation: what's being said out loud. Second: what both parties are thinking but not saying. Third: what each side desperately hopes the other person doesn't figure out.

Modern negotiators focus obsessively on conversation number one. They prep talking points, practice objection handling, and memorise feature-benefit statements. But the Romans? They were masters of reading conversations two and three.

I learned this the hard way about eight years back when I was trying to secure a major training contract with a mining company in Western Australia. Spent weeks perfecting my presentation, had every slide colour-coordinated, knew my pricing inside out. The meeting lasted exactly twelve minutes before they said "we'll be in touch."

Turns out, while I was babbling about learning outcomes and ROI metrics, the decision-maker was worried about one thing: whether his team would actually show up to the sessions. He'd been burned before by fancy consultants whose workshops were emptier than a pub on a Sunday morning.

If I'd been paying attention to the real conversation, I would've addressed his actual concern instead of reciting my elevator pitch like a broken GPS.

The Medici Masterclass in Reading the Room

Jump forward a few centuries to Renaissance Florence. The Medici family didn't become Europe's most powerful banking dynasty by accident. They perfected what I call "strategic patience" – something that makes most Australian business owners break out in hives.

Giovanni di Bicci de' Medici once spent eighteen months building a relationship with a single merchant before even mentioning money. Eighteen months! These days, if a prospect doesn't respond to our LinkedIn message within 48 hours, we write them off as a "poor fit."

The Medicis understood that trust isn't built through proposals and presentations. It's built through consistent, valuable interactions over time. They'd share market intelligence, make introductions, offer advice – all without asking for anything in return.

Sound familiar? It should. It's exactly what the best negotiation training programs teach, but somehow we've convinced ourselves we don't have time for relationship building.

I've got a client in Melbourne who's absolutely brilliant at this. She spends the first six months of any potential partnership just being genuinely helpful. Sends relevant articles, makes strategic introductions, remembers personal details about clients' families. By the time she actually pitches her services, they're already convinced she's indispensable.

The results speak for themselves: 94% conversion rate and an average contract value that's triple her competitors'. But try explaining this to a managing director who wants results yesterday, and you'll get blank stares.

Why Ancient Egyptian Diplomats Would Dominate LinkedIn

Here's where it gets interesting. Egyptian diplomatic papyri from 1400 BCE show negotiation techniques that would make modern sales trainers weep with joy.

Ancient Egyptian negotiators never made the first offer. Ever. They'd spend weeks, sometimes months, gathering intelligence about what the other party really wanted. Not what they said they wanted – what they actually needed to solve their real problems.

They also had this brilliant practice of "shadow negotiating" – working out potential deals with junior officials before ever meeting the decision-maker. By the time they sat down with pharaoh's representative, they already knew exactly which terms would be acceptable.

Compare that to how most Australian businesses approach major deals. We research the company's website, maybe stalk their LinkedIn profiles, then rock up with a generic proposal hoping something sticks.

I was guilty of this exact mistake last year. Pitched a leadership development program to a tech startup in Sydney, focusing on all the usual suspects: productivity, communication skills, team dynamics. Complete waste of everyone's time.

Turns out their real issue wasn't leadership skills – it was founder burnout. The CEO was working 80-hour weeks and slowly losing his mind. What they needed wasn't generic management training; they needed someone to help distribute leadership responsibilities across the team.

If I'd done proper intelligence gathering instead of assuming I knew their problems, I could've saved us all a lot of time and probably landed a much bigger contract.

The Art of Strategic Concessions (Or: How to Give Things Away and Win)

Ancient Chinese negotiators had this concept called "strategic retreat" – deliberately losing small battles to win the war. It's the complete opposite of how most Aussie business owners think about negotiations.

We've been conditioned to believe that every concession is a defeat. Give them a discount? You're weak. Extend the deadline? You're pushover. Throw in extra features? You're devaluing your offering.

But Chinese diplomats from the Han Dynasty would routinely give away things they didn't care about to get things they desperately wanted. They'd even manufacture fake concerns just so they could "reluctantly" concede them later.

Smart? Absolutely. Manipulative? Maybe. Effective? You bet.

I use a version of this in my own consulting practice. When clients push back on pricing, I don't immediately offer discounts. Instead, I'll "reluctantly" remove services I was hoping they wouldn't need anyway. Suddenly, my original package looks like incredible value.

The key is understanding what matters to them versus what matters to you. If they're price-sensitive but you're more concerned about timeline, you've got natural trading material.

Most negotiations fail because both sides focus on the same limited resources instead of looking for creative ways to expand the pie. Ancient negotiators understood this instinctively because they didn't have the luxury of walking away from deals.

Where Modern Business Gets It Completely Wrong

Here's my biggest frustration with contemporary Australian business culture: we've turned negotiation into a performance instead of a conversation.

Watch any "sales training" and it's all about controlling the narrative, handling objections, and closing techniques. It's like we're trying to convince people to do things they don't want to do instead of helping them get things they actually need.

Ancient negotiators approached deals like collaborative problem-solving sessions. They'd openly discuss constraints, share relevant information, and work together to find solutions that benefited everyone involved.

Radical concept, right?

The best professional development courses still teach these principles, but most businesses are too impatient to implement them properly.

I've seen companies spend thousands on "advanced negotiation tactics" when their real problem is that they haven't bothered to understand what their clients actually want. You can't negotiate effectively if you're solving the wrong problem.

The Patience Problem

This brings me to the elephant in the room: modern business moves too fast for ancient wisdom.

Or does it?

Sure, we can't spend eighteen months building relationships like the Medicis. But we also can't afford to keep burning through prospects because we're too impatient to understand their real needs.

The companies that consistently win major contracts are the ones that invest time upfront in proper discovery. They ask better questions, listen more carefully, and design solutions that address actual problems instead of perceived ones.

It's not about moving slower – it's about moving smarter.

What This Means for Your Business Tomorrow

If you take nothing else from this rambling dissertation, remember this: every historical example I've mentioned has one thing in common. Successful negotiators focused on understanding the other party's real situation before trying to sell their own solution.

Start paying attention to conversations two and three. Stop presenting and start investigating. Build relationships before you need them. Give away things you don't value to get things you do.

And for the love of all that's holy, stop treating negotiations like combat. The best deals are the ones where everyone walks away feeling like they won.

Ancient negotiators knew this because they had to live with the consequences of their deals for decades. Maybe it's time we started thinking the same way.

Further Reading: Communication Excellence | Leadership Development | Professional Growth | Business Skills